Skip to main content

Bellevue Heights vs Globe Derby Park

Property investment comparison - Bellevue Heights, SA 5050 vs Globe Derby Park, SA 5110

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Bellevue Heights wins 1, Globe Derby Park wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricBellevue HeightsGlobe Derby Park
Median house price$1.2M-
Median unit price-$730K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.00%2.91%
Gross rental yield (units)2.50%3.43%
1-year house growth+15.9%-
3-year house growth+35.0%-
Vacancy rate1.6%0.8%
Population2,712360

Bellevue Heights vs Globe Derby Park: what the numbers say

On cash flow, Bellevue Heights leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.00%, compared with 2.91% in Globe Derby Park, a gap of 0.09 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 0.8% in Globe Derby Park and 1.6% in Bellevue Heights, so landlords in Globe Derby Park face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Bellevue Heights is the bigger suburb, with a population of 2,712 against 360, roughly 8 times the size of Globe Derby Park; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Bellevue Heights for rental income, Globe Derby Park for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison