Skip to main content

Bellevue Heights vs Green Hills Range

Property investment comparison - Bellevue Heights, SA 5050 vs Green Hills Range, SA 5153

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Bellevue Heights wins 1, Green Hills Range wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricBellevue HeightsGreen Hills Range
Median house price$1.2M-
Median unit price--
Gross rental yield (houses)3.00%3.15%
Gross rental yield (units)2.50%-
1-year house growth+15.9%-
3-year house growth+35.0%-
Vacancy rate1.6%2.6%
Population2,71288

Bellevue Heights vs Green Hills Range: what the numbers say

On cash flow, Green Hills Range leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.15%, compared with 3.00% in Bellevue Heights, a gap of 0.15 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 1.6% in Bellevue Heights and 2.6% in Green Hills Range, so landlords in Bellevue Heights face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Bellevue Heights is the bigger suburb, with a population of 2,712 against 88, roughly 31 times the size of Green Hills Range; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Green Hills Range for rental income, Bellevue Heights for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison