Skip to main content

Bellevue Heights vs Murray Bridge North

Property investment comparison - Bellevue Heights, SA 5050 vs Murray Bridge North, SA 5253

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Bellevue Heights wins 1, Murray Bridge North wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricBellevue HeightsMurray Bridge North
Median house price$1.2M$1.2M
Median unit price-$455K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.00%-
Gross rental yield (units)2.50%5.67%
1-year house growth+15.9%-
3-year house growth+35.0%-
Vacancy rate1.6%0.9%
Population2,712142

Bellevue Heights vs Murray Bridge North: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1.2M in Bellevue Heights and $1.2M in Murray Bridge North, so Bellevue Heights is the cheaper entry point, with Murray Bridge North houses about 3% dearer.

Rental vacancy is 0.9% in Murray Bridge North and 1.6% in Bellevue Heights, so landlords in Murray Bridge North face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Bellevue Heights is the bigger suburb, with a population of 2,712 against 142, roughly 19 times the size of Murray Bridge North; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Bellevue Heights for a lower purchase price, Murray Bridge North for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison