Skip to main content

Bellevue Heights vs Noarlunga Centre

Property investment comparison - Bellevue Heights, SA 5050 vs Noarlunga Centre, SA 5168

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Bellevue Heights wins 1, Noarlunga Centre wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricBellevue HeightsNoarlunga Centre
Median house price$1.2M-
Median unit price--
Gross rental yield (houses)3.00%2.76%
Gross rental yield (units)2.50%4.47%
1-year house growth+15.9%-
3-year house growth+35.0%-
Vacancy rate1.6%1.0%
Population2,712203

Bellevue Heights vs Noarlunga Centre: what the numbers say

On cash flow, Bellevue Heights leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.00%, compared with 2.76% in Noarlunga Centre, a gap of 0.24 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 1.0% in Noarlunga Centre and 1.6% in Bellevue Heights, so landlords in Noarlunga Centre face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Bellevue Heights is the bigger suburb, with a population of 2,712 against 203, roughly 13 times the size of Noarlunga Centre; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Bellevue Heights for rental income, Noarlunga Centre for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison