Skip to main content

Bellevue Heights vs Northgate

Property investment comparison - Bellevue Heights, SA 5050 vs Northgate, SA 5085

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Bellevue Heights wins 1, Northgate wins 4. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricBellevue HeightsNorthgate
Median house price$1.2M$1.1M
Median unit price-$515K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.00%-
Gross rental yield (units)2.50%6.30%
1-year house growth+15.9%+11.1%
3-year house growth+35.0%+41.8%
Vacancy rate1.6%0.7%
Population2,7123,184

Bellevue Heights vs Northgate: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1.2M in Bellevue Heights and $1.1M in Northgate, so Northgate is the cheaper entry point, with Bellevue Heights houses about 1% dearer.

Over the past year house prices moved +15.9% in Bellevue Heights and +11.1% in Northgate, so recent momentum favours Bellevue Heights, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Bellevue Heights houses are +35.0% and Northgate houses +41.8%, so Northgate has compounded faster than Bellevue Heights over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 0.7% in Northgate and 1.6% in Bellevue Heights, so landlords in Northgate face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Northgate is the bigger suburb, with a population of 3,184 against 2,712, larger than Bellevue Heights; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Northgate for a lower purchase price, Bellevue Heights for recent price momentum, Northgate for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison