Skip to main content

Bellevue Heights vs Penfield Gardens

Property investment comparison - Bellevue Heights, SA 5050 vs Penfield Gardens, SA 5121

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Bellevue Heights wins 2, Penfield Gardens wins 0. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricBellevue HeightsPenfield Gardens
Median house price$1.2M-
Median unit price--
Gross rental yield (houses)3.00%2.84%
Gross rental yield (units)2.50%-
1-year house growth+15.9%-
3-year house growth+35.0%-
Vacancy rate1.6%2.7%
Population2,712304

Bellevue Heights vs Penfield Gardens: what the numbers say

On cash flow, Bellevue Heights leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.00%, compared with 2.84% in Penfield Gardens, a gap of 0.16 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 1.6% in Bellevue Heights and 2.7% in Penfield Gardens, so landlords in Bellevue Heights face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Bellevue Heights is the bigger suburb, with a population of 2,712 against 304, roughly 9 times the size of Penfield Gardens; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Bellevue Heights for rental income, Bellevue Heights for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison