Bellevue Heights vs Rostrevor
Property investment comparison - Bellevue Heights, SA 5050 vs Rostrevor, SA 5073
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Bellevue Heights wins 0, Rostrevor wins 4. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Bellevue Heights | Rostrevor |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1.2M | - |
| Median unit price | - | $690K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 3.00% | - |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 2.50% | 4.05% |
| 1-year house growth | +15.9% | +16.7% |
| 3-year house growth | +35.0% | +40.6% |
| Vacancy rate | 1.6% | 1.6% |
| Population | 2,712 | 8,452 |
Bellevue Heights vs Rostrevor: what the numbers say
Over the past year house prices moved +15.9% in Bellevue Heights and +16.7% in Rostrevor, so recent momentum favours Rostrevor, although both suburbs recorded growth.
Looking back three years, Bellevue Heights houses are +35.0% and Rostrevor houses +40.6%, so Rostrevor has compounded faster than Bellevue Heights over the longer window.
Rental vacancy is the same in both, at 1.6%.
Rostrevor is the bigger suburb, with a population of 8,452 against 2,712, roughly 3.1 times the size of Bellevue Heights; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Rostrevor for recent price momentum. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Full profile
Bellevue Heights, SA 5050
Open Bellevue Heights suburb profileRecent sales in Bellevue Heights
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison