Skip to main content

Bellevue Heights vs Salisbury Heights

Property investment comparison - Bellevue Heights, SA 5050 vs Salisbury Heights, SA 5109

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Bellevue Heights wins 1, Salisbury Heights wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricBellevue HeightsSalisbury Heights
Median house price$1.2M-
Median unit price--
Gross rental yield (houses)3.00%-
Gross rental yield (units)2.50%3.46%
1-year house growth+15.9%+9.2%
3-year house growth+35.0%+53.2%
Vacancy rate1.6%0.6%
Population2,7124,488

Bellevue Heights vs Salisbury Heights: what the numbers say

Over the past year house prices moved +15.9% in Bellevue Heights and +9.2% in Salisbury Heights, so recent momentum favours Bellevue Heights, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Bellevue Heights houses are +35.0% and Salisbury Heights houses +53.2%, so Salisbury Heights has compounded faster than Bellevue Heights over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 0.6% in Salisbury Heights and 1.6% in Bellevue Heights, so landlords in Salisbury Heights face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Salisbury Heights is the bigger suburb, with a population of 4,488 against 2,712, larger than Bellevue Heights; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Bellevue Heights for recent price momentum, Salisbury Heights for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison