Skip to main content

Bellevue Heights vs St Peters

Property investment comparison - Bellevue Heights, SA 5050 vs St Peters, SA 5069

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Bellevue Heights wins 3, St Peters wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricBellevue HeightsSt Peters
Median house price$1.2M-
Median unit price-$725K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.00%1.90%
Gross rental yield (units)2.50%-
1-year house growth+15.9%+14.3%
3-year house growth+35.0%+25.6%
Vacancy rate1.6%1.0%
Population2,7123,231

Bellevue Heights vs St Peters: what the numbers say

On cash flow, Bellevue Heights leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.00%, compared with 1.90% in St Peters, a gap of 1.10 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +15.9% in Bellevue Heights and +14.3% in St Peters, so recent momentum favours Bellevue Heights, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Bellevue Heights houses are +35.0% and St Peters houses +25.6%, so Bellevue Heights has compounded faster than St Peters over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 1.0% in St Peters and 1.6% in Bellevue Heights, so landlords in St Peters face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

St Peters is the bigger suburb, with a population of 3,231 against 2,712, larger than Bellevue Heights; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Bellevue Heights for rental income, Bellevue Heights for recent price momentum, St Peters for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison