Skip to main content

Bellevue Heights vs Torrensville

Property investment comparison - Bellevue Heights, SA 5050 vs Torrensville, SA 5031

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Bellevue Heights wins 1, Torrensville wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricBellevue HeightsTorrensville
Median house price$1.2M-
Median unit price--
Gross rental yield (houses)3.00%3.00%
Gross rental yield (units)2.50%4.09%
1-year house growth+15.9%+9.5%estimate
3-year house growth+35.0%-
Vacancy rate1.6%0.1%
Population2,7124,110

Bellevue Heights vs Torrensville: what the numbers say

Gross rental yield on houses is effectively level, at 3.00% in Bellevue Heights and 3.00% in Torrensville, so neither suburb has a cash flow edge on houses.

Over the past year house prices moved +15.9% in Bellevue Heights and +9.5% in Torrensville (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Bellevue Heights, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 0.1% in Torrensville and 1.6% in Bellevue Heights, so landlords in Torrensville face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Torrensville is the bigger suburb, with a population of 4,110 against 2,712, larger than Bellevue Heights; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Bellevue Heights for recent price momentum, Torrensville for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison