Skip to main content

Bellfield vs Bittern

Property investment comparison - Bellfield, VIC 3081 vs Bittern, VIC 3918

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Bellfield wins 3, Bittern wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricBellfieldBittern
Median house price$1.0M$1.1M
Median unit price-$720K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.30%3.28%
Gross rental yield (units)--
1-year house growth+3.4%estimate-2.9%estimate
3-year house growth--
Vacancy rate1.6%0.4%
Population1,9964,276

Bellfield vs Bittern: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1.0M in Bellfield and $1.1M in Bittern, so Bellfield is the cheaper entry point.

Gross rental yield on houses is effectively level, at 3.30% in Bellfield and 3.28% in Bittern, so neither suburb has a cash flow edge on houses.

Over the past year house prices moved +3.4% in Bellfield (an estimate) and -2.9% in Bittern (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Bellfield, while Bittern went backwards.

Rental vacancy is 0.4% in Bittern and 1.6% in Bellfield, so landlords in Bittern face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Bittern is the bigger suburb, with a population of 4,276 against 1,996, roughly 2.1 times the size of Bellfield; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Bellfield for a lower purchase price, Bellfield for recent price momentum, Bittern for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison