Skip to main content

Bellfield vs Wattle Glen

Property investment comparison - Bellfield, VIC 3081 vs Wattle Glen, VIC 3096

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Bellfield wins 3, Wattle Glen wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricBellfieldWattle Glen
Median house price$1.0M$1.1M
Median unit price--
Gross rental yield (houses)3.30%4.11%
Gross rental yield (units)-2.59%
1-year house growth+3.4%estimate+1.7%
3-year house growth-+18.1%
Vacancy rate1.6%3.0%
Population1,9961,911

Bellfield vs Wattle Glen: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1.0M in Bellfield and $1.1M in Wattle Glen, so Bellfield is the cheaper entry point, with Wattle Glen houses about 1% dearer.

On cash flow, Wattle Glen leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.11%, compared with 3.30% in Bellfield, a gap of 0.81 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +3.4% in Bellfield (an estimate) and +1.7% in Wattle Glen, so recent momentum favours Bellfield, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 1.6% in Bellfield and 3.0% in Wattle Glen, so landlords in Bellfield face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Bellfield is the bigger suburb, with a population of 1,996 against 1,911, larger than Wattle Glen; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Wattle Glen for rental income, Bellfield for a lower purchase price, Bellfield for recent price momentum, Bellfield for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison