Bellfield vs Yuroke
Property investment comparison - Bellfield, VIC 3081 vs Yuroke, VIC 3063
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Bellfield wins 1, Yuroke wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Bellfield | Yuroke |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1.0M | $1.0M |
| Median unit price | - | - |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 3.30% | 3.79% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | - | - |
| 1-year house growth | +3.4%estimate | - |
| 3-year house growth | - | - |
| Vacancy rate | 1.6% | 5.4% |
| Population | 1,996 | 123 |
Bellfield vs Yuroke: what the numbers say
Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $1.0M in Bellfield and $1.0M in Yuroke.
On cash flow, Yuroke leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.79%, compared with 3.30% in Bellfield, a gap of 0.49 percentage points.
Rental vacancy is 1.6% in Bellfield and 5.4% in Yuroke, so landlords in Bellfield face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Bellfield is the bigger suburb, with a population of 1,996 against 123, roughly 16 times the size of Yuroke; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Yuroke for rental income, Bellfield for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison