Skip to main content

Belmont vs Fletcher

Property investment comparison - Belmont, NSW 2280 vs Fletcher, NSW 2287

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Belmont wins 3, Fletcher wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricBelmontFletcher
Median house price$1.1M$1.1M
Median unit price$685K$750K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.59%-
Gross rental yield (units)4.15%5.11%
1-year house growth+10.3%+12.2%
3-year house growth+23.1%+20.6%
Vacancy rate0.9%2.2%
Population7,2898,014

Belmont vs Fletcher: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $1.1M in Belmont and $1.1M in Fletcher.

For units, Belmont sits at a median of $685K against $750K in Fletcher, which makes Belmont the more affordable unit market and Fletcher the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved +10.3% in Belmont and +12.2% in Fletcher, so recent momentum favours Fletcher, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Belmont houses are +23.1% and Fletcher houses +20.6%, so Belmont has compounded faster than Fletcher over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 0.9% in Belmont and 2.2% in Fletcher, so landlords in Belmont face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Fletcher is the bigger suburb, with a population of 8,014 against 7,289, larger than Belmont; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Fletcher for recent price momentum, Belmont for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison