Skip to main content

Belmont vs Riverside

Property investment comparison - Belmont, NSW 2280 vs Riverside, NSW 2444

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Belmont wins 3, Riverside wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricBelmontRiverside
Median house price$1.1M$1.1M
Median unit price$685K$620K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.59%3.25%
Gross rental yield (units)4.15%4.27%
1-year house growth+10.3%-6.5%
3-year house growth+23.1%-
Vacancy rate0.9%8.2%
Population7,289298

Belmont vs Riverside: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $1.1M in Belmont and $1.1M in Riverside.

For units, Belmont sits at a median of $685K against $620K in Riverside, which makes Riverside the more affordable unit market and Belmont the pricier one.

On cash flow, Belmont leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.59%, compared with 3.25% in Riverside, a gap of 0.34 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +10.3% in Belmont and -6.5% in Riverside, so recent momentum favours Belmont, while Riverside went backwards.

Rental vacancy is 0.9% in Belmont and 8.2% in Riverside, so landlords in Belmont face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Belmont is the bigger suburb, with a population of 7,289 against 298, roughly 24 times the size of Riverside; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Belmont for rental income, Belmont for recent price momentum, Belmont for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison