Belmont vs Gaven
Property investment comparison - Belmont, QLD 4153 vs Gaven, QLD 4211
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Belmont wins 3, Gaven wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Belmont | Gaven |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1.5M | $1.6M |
| Median unit price | $900K | $895K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | - | 3.14% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 4.30% | 4.55% |
| 1-year house growth | +11.2% | +4.3% |
| 3-year house growth | +46.3% | +32.0% |
| Vacancy rate | 1.2% | 1.1% |
| Population | 4,498 | 1,638 |
Belmont vs Gaven: what the numbers say
The median house price is $1.5M in Belmont and $1.6M in Gaven, so Belmont is the cheaper entry point, with Gaven houses about 2% dearer.
For units, Belmont sits at a median of $900K against $895K in Gaven, which makes Gaven the more affordable unit market and Belmont the pricier one.
Over the past year house prices moved +11.2% in Belmont and +4.3% in Gaven, so recent momentum favours Belmont, although both suburbs recorded growth.
Looking back three years, Belmont houses are +46.3% and Gaven houses +32.0%, so Belmont has compounded faster than Gaven over the longer window.
Rental vacancy is the same in both, at 1.2%.
Belmont is the bigger suburb, with a population of 4,498 against 1,638, roughly 2.7 times the size of Gaven; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Belmont for a lower purchase price, Belmont for recent price momentum. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison