Skip to main content

Belrose vs Enfield

Property investment comparison - Belrose, NSW 2085 vs Enfield, NSW 2136

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Belrose wins 3, Enfield wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricBelroseEnfield
Median house price$2.4M$2.4M
Median unit price-$810K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.34%2.43%
Gross rental yield (units)2.22%-
1-year house growth-1.4%estimate-4.3%
3-year house growth-+22.3%
Vacancy rate1.7%2.0%
Population8,7262,992

Belrose vs Enfield: what the numbers say

The median house price is $2.4M in Belrose and $2.4M in Enfield, so Enfield is the cheaper entry point, with Belrose houses about 1% dearer.

On cash flow, Belrose leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.34%, compared with 2.43% in Enfield, a gap of 0.91 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved -1.4% in Belrose (an estimate) and -4.3% in Enfield, so recent momentum favours Belrose, while Enfield went backwards.

Rental vacancy is 1.7% in Belrose and 2.0% in Enfield, so landlords in Belrose face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Belrose is the bigger suburb, with a population of 8,726 against 2,992, roughly 2.9 times the size of Enfield; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Belrose for rental income, Enfield for a lower purchase price, Belrose for recent price momentum, Belrose for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison