Skip to main content

Benalla vs Hamilton

Property investment comparison - Benalla, VIC 3673 vs Hamilton, VIC 3300

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Benalla wins 2, Hamilton wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricBenallaHamilton
Median house price$445K$440K
Median unit price$315K$325K
Gross rental yield (houses)5.87%4.76%
Gross rental yield (units)3.31%5.53%
1-year house growth-+10.6%estimate
3-year house growth--
Vacancy rate3.0%0.3%
Population10,82210,346

Benalla vs Hamilton: what the numbers say

The median house price is $445K in Benalla and $440K in Hamilton, so Hamilton is the cheaper entry point, with Benalla houses about 1% dearer.

For units, Benalla sits at a median of $315K against $325K in Hamilton, which makes Benalla the more affordable unit market and Hamilton the pricier one.

On cash flow, Benalla leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 5.87%, compared with 4.76% in Hamilton, a gap of 1.11 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 0.3% in Hamilton and 3.0% in Benalla, so landlords in Hamilton face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Benalla is the bigger suburb, with a population of 10,822 against 10,346, larger than Hamilton; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Benalla for rental income, Hamilton for a lower purchase price, Hamilton for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison