Skip to main content

Bennison vs Bundoora

Property investment comparison - Bennison, VIC 3960 vs Bundoora, VIC 3083

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Bennison wins 3, Bundoora wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricBennisonBundoora
Median house price$910K$910K
Median unit price$405K$505K
Gross rental yield (houses)2.51%3.44%
Gross rental yield (units)4.37%5.25%
1-year house growth+7.8%estimate+1.8%estimate
3-year house growth--
Vacancy rate1.2%1.5%
Population4228,068

Bennison vs Bundoora: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $910K in Bennison and $910K in Bundoora.

For units, Bennison sits at a median of $405K against $505K in Bundoora, which makes Bennison the more affordable unit market and Bundoora the pricier one.

On cash flow, Bundoora leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.44%, compared with 2.51% in Bennison, a gap of 0.93 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +7.8% in Bennison (an estimate) and +1.8% in Bundoora (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Bennison, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 1.2% in Bennison and 1.5% in Bundoora, so landlords in Bennison face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Bundoora is the bigger suburb, with a population of 28,068 against 42, roughly 668 times the size of Bennison; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Bundoora for rental income, Bennison for recent price momentum, Bennison for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison