Skip to main content

Benowa vs Carindale

Property investment comparison - Benowa, QLD 4217 vs Carindale, QLD 4152

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Benowa wins 1, Carindale wins 4. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricBenowaCarindale
Median house price$1.8M$1.8M
Median unit price$1M$980K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.92%-
Gross rental yield (units)--
1-year house growth+16.9%+10.4%
3-year house growth+19.5%+36.5%
Vacancy rate2.0%1.4%
Population9,88916,535

Benowa vs Carindale: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1.8M in Benowa and $1.8M in Carindale, so Carindale is the cheaper entry point.

For units, Benowa sits at a median of $1M against $980K in Carindale, which makes Carindale the more affordable unit market and Benowa the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved +16.9% in Benowa and +10.4% in Carindale, so recent momentum favours Benowa, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Benowa houses are +19.5% and Carindale houses +36.5%, so Carindale has compounded faster than Benowa over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 1.4% in Carindale and 2.0% in Benowa, so landlords in Carindale face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Carindale is the bigger suburb, with a population of 16,535 against 9,889, larger than Benowa; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Carindale for a lower purchase price, Benowa for recent price momentum, Carindale for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison