Skip to main content

Berala vs Mount Kuring-Gai

Property investment comparison - Berala, NSW 2141 vs Mount Kuring-Gai, NSW 2080

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Berala wins 2, Mount Kuring-Gai wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricBeralaMount Kuring-Gai
Median house price$1.6M$1.6M
Median unit price$520K$330K
Gross rental yield (houses)-2.94%
Gross rental yield (units)5.49%5.99%
1-year house growth+5.9%estimate+1.4%estimate
3-year house growth--
Vacancy rate1.1%3.9%
Population8,7571,766

Berala vs Mount Kuring-Gai: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $1.6M in Berala and $1.6M in Mount Kuring-Gai.

For units, Berala sits at a median of $520K against $330K in Mount Kuring-Gai, which makes Mount Kuring-Gai the more affordable unit market and Berala the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved +5.9% in Berala (an estimate) and +1.4% in Mount Kuring-Gai (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Berala, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 1.1% in Berala and 3.9% in Mount Kuring-Gai, so landlords in Berala face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Berala is the bigger suburb, with a population of 8,757 against 1,766, roughly 5.0 times the size of Mount Kuring-Gai; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Berala for recent price momentum, Berala for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison