Skip to main content

Berala vs Parramatta

Property investment comparison - Berala, NSW 2141 vs Parramatta, NSW 2150

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Berala wins 3, Parramatta wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricBeralaParramatta
Median house price$1.6M$1.6M
Median unit price$520K$620K
Gross rental yield (houses)-2.37%
Gross rental yield (units)5.49%5.70%
1-year house growth+5.9%estimate-0.6%estimate
3-year house growth--
Vacancy rate1.1%1.4%
Population8,75730,211

Berala vs Parramatta: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $1.6M in Berala and $1.6M in Parramatta.

For units, Berala sits at a median of $520K against $620K in Parramatta, which makes Berala the more affordable unit market and Parramatta the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved +5.9% in Berala (an estimate) and -0.6% in Parramatta (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Berala, while Parramatta went backwards.

Rental vacancy is 1.1% in Berala and 1.4% in Parramatta, so landlords in Berala face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Parramatta is the bigger suburb, with a population of 30,211 against 8,757, roughly 3.4 times the size of Berala; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Berala for recent price momentum, Berala for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison