Skip to main content

Beresfield vs Four Mile Creek

Property investment comparison - Beresfield, NSW 2322 vs Four Mile Creek, NSW 2323

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Beresfield wins 0, Four Mile Creek wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricBeresfieldFour Mile Creek
Median house price$780K$780K
Median unit price$620K$620K
Gross rental yield (houses)4.03%4.22%
Gross rental yield (units)4.37%4.37%
1-year house growth+11.7%estimate-
3-year house growth--
Vacancy rate1.0%0.6%
Population3,26716

Beresfield vs Four Mile Creek: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $780K in Beresfield and $780K in Four Mile Creek.

On cash flow, Four Mile Creek leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.22%, compared with 4.03% in Beresfield, a gap of 0.19 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 0.6% in Four Mile Creek and 1.0% in Beresfield, so landlords in Four Mile Creek face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Beresfield is the bigger suburb, with a population of 3,267 against 16, roughly 204 times the size of Four Mile Creek; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Four Mile Creek for rental income, Four Mile Creek for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison