Skip to main content

Beresfield vs Moama

Property investment comparison - Beresfield, NSW 2322 vs Moama, NSW 2731

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Beresfield wins 1, Moama wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricBeresfieldMoama
Median house price$780K$780K
Median unit price$620K$440K
Gross rental yield (houses)4.03%-
Gross rental yield (units)4.37%5.89%
1-year house growth+11.7%estimate-0.2%
3-year house growth--5.1%
Vacancy rate1.0%0.7%
Population3,2677,213

Beresfield vs Moama: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $780K in Beresfield and $780K in Moama.

For units, Beresfield sits at a median of $620K against $440K in Moama, which makes Moama the more affordable unit market and Beresfield the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved +11.7% in Beresfield (an estimate) and -0.2% in Moama, so recent momentum favours Beresfield, while Moama went backwards.

Rental vacancy is 0.7% in Moama and 1.0% in Beresfield, so landlords in Moama face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Moama is the bigger suburb, with a population of 7,213 against 3,267, roughly 2.2 times the size of Beresfield; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Beresfield for recent price momentum, Moama for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison