Berkeley vs Croom
Property investment comparison - Berkeley, NSW 2506 vs Croom, NSW 2527
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Berkeley wins 1, Croom wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Berkeley | Croom |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $865K | $865K |
| Median unit price | $870K | $725K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 3.92% | 4.74% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | - | 5.61% |
| 1-year house growth | +8.2% | - |
| 3-year house growth | +13.3% | - |
| Vacancy rate | 0.6% | 0.6% |
| Population | 7,798 | 112 |
Berkeley vs Croom: what the numbers say
Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $865K in Berkeley and $865K in Croom.
For units, Berkeley sits at a median of $870K against $725K in Croom, which makes Croom the more affordable unit market and Berkeley the pricier one.
On cash flow, Croom leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.74%, compared with 3.92% in Berkeley, a gap of 0.82 percentage points.
Rental vacancy is the same in both, at 0.6%.
Berkeley is the bigger suburb, with a population of 7,798 against 112, roughly 70 times the size of Croom; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Croom for rental income. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison