Skip to main content

Berrinba vs Rothwell

Property investment comparison - Berrinba, QLD 4117 vs Rothwell, QLD 4022

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Berrinba wins 4, Rothwell wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricBerrinbaRothwell
Median house price$980K$985K
Median unit price$720K-
Gross rental yield (houses)3.64%3.60%
Gross rental yield (units)3.53%4.00%
1-year house growth+18.3%estimate+17.4%
3-year house growth-+47.5%
Vacancy rate0.4%0.8%
Population2,6157,538

Berrinba vs Rothwell: what the numbers say

The median house price is $980K in Berrinba and $985K in Rothwell, so Berrinba is the cheaper entry point, with Rothwell houses about 1% dearer.

Gross rental yield on houses is effectively level, at 3.64% in Berrinba and 3.60% in Rothwell, so neither suburb has a cash flow edge on houses.

Over the past year house prices moved +18.3% in Berrinba (an estimate) and +17.4% in Rothwell, so recent momentum favours Berrinba, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 0.4% in Berrinba and 0.8% in Rothwell, so landlords in Berrinba face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Rothwell is the bigger suburb, with a population of 7,538 against 2,615, roughly 2.9 times the size of Berrinba; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Berrinba for a lower purchase price, Berrinba for recent price momentum, Berrinba for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison