Skip to main content

Berringa vs Lakes Entrance

Property investment comparison - Berringa, VIC 3351 vs Lakes Entrance, VIC 3909

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Berringa wins 1, Lakes Entrance wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricBerringaLakes Entrance
Median house price$540K$540K
Median unit price-$430K
Gross rental yield (houses)5.58%4.80%
Gross rental yield (units)-4.50%
1-year house growth-+4.4%
3-year house growth-+0.8%
Vacancy rate2.6%1.4%
Population1945,145

Berringa vs Lakes Entrance: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $540K in Berringa and $540K in Lakes Entrance.

On cash flow, Berringa leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 5.58%, compared with 4.80% in Lakes Entrance, a gap of 0.78 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 1.4% in Lakes Entrance and 2.6% in Berringa, so landlords in Lakes Entrance face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Lakes Entrance is the bigger suburb, with a population of 5,145 against 194, roughly 27 times the size of Berringa; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Berringa for rental income, Lakes Entrance for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison