Berringa vs Mount Beauty
Property investment comparison - Berringa, VIC 3351 vs Mount Beauty, VIC 3699
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Berringa wins 1, Mount Beauty wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Berringa | Mount Beauty |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $540K | $540K |
| Median unit price | - | $305K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 5.58% | 4.67% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | - | - |
| 1-year house growth | - | +4.7%estimate |
| 3-year house growth | - | - |
| Vacancy rate | 2.6% | 1.6% |
| Population | 194 | 910 |
Berringa vs Mount Beauty: what the numbers say
Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $540K in Berringa and $540K in Mount Beauty.
On cash flow, Berringa leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 5.58%, compared with 4.67% in Mount Beauty, a gap of 0.91 percentage points.
Rental vacancy is 1.6% in Mount Beauty and 2.6% in Berringa, so landlords in Mount Beauty face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Mount Beauty is the bigger suburb, with a population of 910 against 194, roughly 4.7 times the size of Berringa; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Berringa for rental income, Mount Beauty for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison