Berry vs Terara
Property investment comparison - Berry, NSW 2535 vs Terara, NSW 2540
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Berry wins 2, Terara wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Berry | Terara |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1.7M | $1.7M |
| Median unit price | $790K | $625K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 2.60% | 1.88% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | - | 4.20% |
| 1-year house growth | +2.3% | - |
| 3-year house growth | -2.4% | - |
| Vacancy rate | 2.3% | 2.4% |
| Population | 3,098 | 305 |
Berry vs Terara: what the numbers say
Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $1.7M in Berry and $1.7M in Terara.
For units, Berry sits at a median of $790K against $625K in Terara, which makes Terara the more affordable unit market and Berry the pricier one.
On cash flow, Berry leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 2.60%, compared with 1.88% in Terara, a gap of 0.72 percentage points.
Rental vacancy is 2.3% in Berry and 2.4% in Terara, so landlords in Berry face less competition for tenants.
Berry is the bigger suburb, with a population of 3,098 against 305, roughly 10 times the size of Terara; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Berry for rental income, Berry for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison