Skip to main content

Berserker vs Blackbutt

Property investment comparison - Berserker, QLD 4701 vs Blackbutt, QLD 4314

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Berserker wins 3, Blackbutt wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricBerserkerBlackbutt
Median house price$540K$530K
Median unit price$485K$570K
Gross rental yield (houses)5.10%-
Gross rental yield (units)4.90%4.40%
1-year house growth+18.6%+13.3%estimate
3-year house growth+86.1%-
Vacancy rate1.5%1.3%
Population7,020799

Berserker vs Blackbutt: what the numbers say

The median house price is $540K in Berserker and $530K in Blackbutt, so Blackbutt is the cheaper entry point, with Berserker houses about 2% dearer.

For units, Berserker sits at a median of $485K against $570K in Blackbutt, which makes Berserker the more affordable unit market and Blackbutt the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved +18.6% in Berserker and +13.3% in Blackbutt (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Berserker, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 1.3% in Blackbutt and 1.5% in Berserker, so landlords in Blackbutt face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Berserker is the bigger suburb, with a population of 7,020 against 799, roughly 9 times the size of Blackbutt; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Blackbutt for a lower purchase price, Berserker for recent price momentum, Blackbutt for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison
Berserker vs Blackbutt: Suburb Comparison 2026