Big Grove vs Karrinyup
Property investment comparison - Big Grove, WA 6330 vs Karrinyup, WA 6018
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Big Grove wins 1, Karrinyup wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Big Grove | Karrinyup |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1.7M | $1.7M |
| Median unit price | $450K | - |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 1.64% | 3.06% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 6.22% | - |
| 1-year house growth | - | +12.0% |
| 3-year house growth | - | +47.8% |
| Vacancy rate | 0.2% | 1.8% |
| Population | 225 | 9,886 |
Big Grove vs Karrinyup: what the numbers say
The median house price is $1.7M in Big Grove and $1.7M in Karrinyup, so Karrinyup is the cheaper entry point, with Big Grove houses about 2% dearer.
On cash flow, Karrinyup leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.06%, compared with 1.64% in Big Grove, a gap of 1.42 percentage points.
Rental vacancy is 0.2% in Big Grove and 1.8% in Karrinyup, so landlords in Big Grove face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Karrinyup is the bigger suburb, with a population of 9,886 against 225, roughly 44 times the size of Big Grove; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Karrinyup for rental income, Karrinyup for a lower purchase price, Big Grove for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison