Binna Burra vs Whitfield
Property investment comparison - Binna Burra, QLD 4211 vs Whitfield, QLD 4870
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Binna Burra wins 2, Whitfield wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Binna Burra | Whitfield |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $960K | $960K |
| Median unit price | - | - |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 5.03% | 4.45% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 6.91% | 5.46% |
| 1-year house growth | - | +13.4% |
| 3-year house growth | - | +34.4% |
| Vacancy rate | 1.1% | 0.8% |
| Population | 0 | 4,262 |
Binna Burra vs Whitfield: what the numbers say
Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $960K in Binna Burra and $960K in Whitfield.
On cash flow, Binna Burra leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 5.03%, compared with 4.45% in Whitfield, a gap of 0.58 percentage points.
Rental vacancy is 0.8% in Whitfield and 1.1% in Binna Burra, so landlords in Whitfield face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
In short: Binna Burra for rental income, Whitfield for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison