Skip to main content

Binningup vs Bulgarra

Property investment comparison - Binningup, WA 6233 vs Bulgarra, WA 6714

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Binningup wins 2, Bulgarra wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricBinningupBulgarra
Median house price$700K$700K
Median unit price$85K$350K
Gross rental yield (houses)5.01%9.35%
Gross rental yield (units)4.82%11.37%
1-year house growth+24.1%estimate+21.4%estimate
3-year house growth--
Vacancy rate1.2%1.0%
Population1,2962,990

Binningup vs Bulgarra: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $700K in Binningup and $700K in Bulgarra.

For units, Binningup sits at a median of $85K against $350K in Bulgarra, which makes Binningup the more affordable unit market and Bulgarra the pricier one.

On cash flow, Bulgarra leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 9.35%, compared with 5.01% in Binningup, a gap of 4.34 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +24.1% in Binningup (an estimate) and +21.4% in Bulgarra (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Binningup, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 1.0% in Bulgarra and 1.2% in Binningup, so landlords in Bulgarra face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Bulgarra is the bigger suburb, with a population of 2,990 against 1,296, roughly 2.3 times the size of Binningup; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Bulgarra for rental income, Binningup for recent price momentum, Bulgarra for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison