Skip to main content

Birkenhead vs Sellicks Beach

Property investment comparison - Birkenhead, SA 5015 vs Sellicks Beach, SA 5174

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Birkenhead wins 3, Sellicks Beach wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricBirkenheadSellicks Beach
Median house price$895K$880K
Median unit price-$1.4M
Gross rental yield (houses)3.60%3.46%
Gross rental yield (units)4.09%3.05%
1-year house growth+10.3%estimate+14.0%
3-year house growth-+36.5%
Vacancy rate0.5%0.9%
Population1,7982,705

Birkenhead vs Sellicks Beach: what the numbers say

The median house price is $895K in Birkenhead and $880K in Sellicks Beach, so Sellicks Beach is the cheaper entry point, with Birkenhead houses about 2% dearer.

On cash flow, Birkenhead leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.60%, compared with 3.46% in Sellicks Beach, a gap of 0.14 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +10.3% in Birkenhead (an estimate) and +14.0% in Sellicks Beach, so recent momentum favours Sellicks Beach, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 0.5% in Birkenhead and 0.9% in Sellicks Beach, so landlords in Birkenhead face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Sellicks Beach is the bigger suburb, with a population of 2,705 against 1,798, larger than Birkenhead; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Birkenhead for rental income, Sellicks Beach for a lower purchase price, Sellicks Beach for recent price momentum, Birkenhead for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison