Skip to main content

Birtinya vs Maroochydore

Property investment comparison - Birtinya, QLD 4575 vs Maroochydore, QLD 4558

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Birtinya wins 5, Maroochydore wins 0. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricBirtinyaMaroochydore
Median house price$1.3M$1.3M
Median unit price$860K$910K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.60%-
Gross rental yield (units)4.05%-
1-year house growth+21.4%+13.7%
3-year house growth+41.1%+28.4%
Vacancy rate1.3%1.3%
Population4,37820,629

Birtinya vs Maroochydore: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1.3M in Birtinya and $1.3M in Maroochydore, so Birtinya is the cheaper entry point.

For units, Birtinya sits at a median of $860K against $910K in Maroochydore, which makes Birtinya the more affordable unit market and Maroochydore the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved +21.4% in Birtinya and +13.7% in Maroochydore, so recent momentum favours Birtinya, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Birtinya houses are +41.1% and Maroochydore houses +28.4%, so Birtinya has compounded faster than Maroochydore over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is the same in both, at 1.3%.

Maroochydore is the bigger suburb, with a population of 20,629 against 4,378, roughly 4.7 times the size of Birtinya; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Birtinya for a lower purchase price, Birtinya for recent price momentum. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison