Birtinya vs Pinnacles
Property investment comparison - Birtinya, QLD 4575 vs Pinnacles, QLD 4815
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Birtinya wins 1, Pinnacles wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Birtinya | Pinnacles |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1.3M | $1.3M |
| Median unit price | $860K | - |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 3.60% | 2.49% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 4.05% | - |
| 1-year house growth | +21.4% | - |
| 3-year house growth | +41.1% | - |
| Vacancy rate | 1.3% | 0.9% |
| Population | 4,378 | 83 |
Birtinya vs Pinnacles: what the numbers say
The median house price is $1.3M in Birtinya and $1.3M in Pinnacles, so Pinnacles is the cheaper entry point.
On cash flow, Birtinya leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.60%, compared with 2.49% in Pinnacles, a gap of 1.11 percentage points.
Rental vacancy is 0.9% in Pinnacles and 1.3% in Birtinya, so landlords in Pinnacles face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Birtinya is the bigger suburb, with a population of 4,378 against 83, roughly 53 times the size of Pinnacles; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Birtinya for rental income, Pinnacles for a lower purchase price, Pinnacles for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison