Skip to main content

Black Rock vs Mont Albert

Property investment comparison - Black Rock, VIC 3193 vs Mont Albert, VIC 3127

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Black Rock wins 3, Mont Albert wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricBlack RockMont Albert
Median house price$2.4M$2.2M
Median unit price-$820K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.00%1.74%
Gross rental yield (units)3.68%-
1-year house growth-2.3%-6.5%estimate
3-year house growth+4.9%-
Vacancy rate1.1%1.9%
Population6,3894,948

Black Rock vs Mont Albert: what the numbers say

The median house price is $2.4M in Black Rock and $2.2M in Mont Albert, so Mont Albert is the cheaper entry point, with Black Rock houses about 5% dearer.

On cash flow, Black Rock leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.00%, compared with 1.74% in Mont Albert, a gap of 1.26 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved -2.3% in Black Rock and -6.5% in Mont Albert (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Black Rock, while Mont Albert went backwards.

Rental vacancy is 1.1% in Black Rock and 1.9% in Mont Albert, so landlords in Black Rock face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Black Rock is the bigger suburb, with a population of 6,389 against 4,948, larger than Mont Albert; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Black Rock for rental income, Mont Albert for a lower purchase price, Black Rock for recent price momentum, Black Rock for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison