Skip to main content

Blackbutt North vs Pimlico

Property investment comparison - Blackbutt North, QLD 4314 vs Pimlico, QLD 4812

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Blackbutt North wins 3, Pimlico wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricBlackbutt NorthPimlico
Median house price$660K$660K
Median unit price$355K$400K
Gross rental yield (houses)4.40%4.52%
Gross rental yield (units)6.39%5.50%
1-year house growth+17.7%+16.0%
3-year house growth+63.2%+80.2%
Vacancy rate1.2%1.1%
Population4512,557

Blackbutt North vs Pimlico: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $660K in Blackbutt North and $660K in Pimlico.

For units, Blackbutt North sits at a median of $355K against $400K in Pimlico, which makes Blackbutt North the more affordable unit market and Pimlico the pricier one.

On cash flow, Pimlico leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.52%, compared with 4.40% in Blackbutt North, a gap of 0.12 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +17.7% in Blackbutt North and +16.0% in Pimlico, so recent momentum favours Blackbutt North, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Blackbutt North houses are +63.2% and Pimlico houses +80.2%, so Pimlico has compounded faster than Blackbutt North over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is the same in both, at 1.2%.

Pimlico is the bigger suburb, with a population of 2,557 against 451, roughly 6 times the size of Blackbutt North; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Pimlico for rental income, Blackbutt North for recent price momentum. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison