Skip to main content

Blackbutt vs Budgong

Property investment comparison - Blackbutt, NSW 2529 vs Budgong, NSW 2577

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Blackbutt wins 1, Budgong wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricBlackbuttBudgong
Median house price$1.1M$1.1M
Median unit price$750K$645K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.87%3.98%
Gross rental yield (units)4.60%5.57%
1-year house growth+7.5%estimate-
3-year house growth--
Vacancy rate1.1%1.9%
Population3,29187

Blackbutt vs Budgong: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $1.1M in Blackbutt and $1.1M in Budgong.

For units, Blackbutt sits at a median of $750K against $645K in Budgong, which makes Budgong the more affordable unit market and Blackbutt the pricier one.

On cash flow, Budgong leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.98%, compared with 3.87% in Blackbutt, a gap of 0.11 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 1.1% in Blackbutt and 1.9% in Budgong, so landlords in Blackbutt face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Blackbutt is the bigger suburb, with a population of 3,291 against 87, roughly 38 times the size of Budgong; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Budgong for rental income, Blackbutt for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison