Skip to main content

Blackbutt vs Googong

Property investment comparison - Blackbutt, NSW 2529 vs Googong, NSW 2620

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Blackbutt wins 4, Googong wins 0. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricBlackbuttGoogong
Median house price$1.1M$1.1M
Median unit price$750K-
Gross rental yield (houses)3.87%3.60%
Gross rental yield (units)4.60%-
1-year house growth+7.5%estimate+6.4%
3-year house growth-+7.6%
Vacancy rate1.1%3.1%
Population3,2917,444

Blackbutt vs Googong: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1.1M in Blackbutt and $1.1M in Googong, so Blackbutt is the cheaper entry point.

On cash flow, Blackbutt leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.87%, compared with 3.60% in Googong, a gap of 0.27 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +7.5% in Blackbutt (an estimate) and +6.4% in Googong, so recent momentum favours Blackbutt, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 1.1% in Blackbutt and 3.1% in Googong, so landlords in Blackbutt face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Googong is the bigger suburb, with a population of 7,444 against 3,291, roughly 2.3 times the size of Blackbutt; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Blackbutt for rental income, Blackbutt for a lower purchase price, Blackbutt for recent price momentum, Blackbutt for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison