Skip to main content

Blackbutt vs Plumpton

Property investment comparison - Blackbutt, NSW 2529 vs Plumpton, NSW 2761

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Blackbutt wins 3, Plumpton wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricBlackbuttPlumpton
Median house price$1.1M$1.1M
Median unit price$750K$825K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.87%3.14%
Gross rental yield (units)4.60%-
1-year house growth+7.5%estimate+9.4%
3-year house growth-+27.6%
Vacancy rate1.1%1.6%
Population3,29110,070

Blackbutt vs Plumpton: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $1.1M in Blackbutt and $1.1M in Plumpton.

For units, Blackbutt sits at a median of $750K against $825K in Plumpton, which makes Blackbutt the more affordable unit market and Plumpton the pricier one.

On cash flow, Blackbutt leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.87%, compared with 3.14% in Plumpton, a gap of 0.73 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +7.5% in Blackbutt (an estimate) and +9.4% in Plumpton, so recent momentum favours Plumpton, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 1.1% in Blackbutt and 1.6% in Plumpton, so landlords in Blackbutt face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Plumpton is the bigger suburb, with a population of 10,070 against 3,291, roughly 3.1 times the size of Blackbutt; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Blackbutt for rental income, Plumpton for recent price momentum, Blackbutt for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison