Blackstone vs Loganholme
Property investment comparison - Blackstone, QLD 4304 vs Loganholme, QLD 4129
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Blackstone wins 2, Loganholme wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Blackstone | Loganholme |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $915K | $915K |
| Median unit price | - | - |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | - | 3.83% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 3.85% | 4.11% |
| 1-year house growth | +18.1% | +15.5%estimate |
| 3-year house growth | +61.9% | - |
| Vacancy rate | 0.9% | 0.9% |
| Population | 1,144 | 6,764 |
Blackstone vs Loganholme: what the numbers say
Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $915K in Blackstone and $915K in Loganholme.
Over the past year house prices moved +18.1% in Blackstone and +15.5% in Loganholme (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Blackstone, although both suburbs recorded growth.
Rental vacancy is the same in both, at 0.9%.
Loganholme is the bigger suburb, with a population of 6,764 against 1,144, roughly 6 times the size of Blackstone; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Blackstone for recent price momentum. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison