Skip to main content

Blackwood vs Brooklyn Park

Property investment comparison - Blackwood, SA 5051 vs Brooklyn Park, SA 5032

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Blackwood wins 1, Brooklyn Park wins 4. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricBlackwoodBrooklyn Park
Median house price$1.1M$1.1M
Median unit price$700K$520K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.10%-
Gross rental yield (units)3.87%4.50%
1-year house growth+7.1%+12.1%estimate
3-year house growth+39.4%-
Vacancy rate0.4%1.1%
Population4,2665,040

Blackwood vs Brooklyn Park: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1.1M in Blackwood and $1.1M in Brooklyn Park, so Brooklyn Park is the cheaper entry point, with Blackwood houses about 1% dearer.

For units, Blackwood sits at a median of $700K against $520K in Brooklyn Park, which makes Brooklyn Park the more affordable unit market and Blackwood the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved +7.1% in Blackwood and +12.1% in Brooklyn Park (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Brooklyn Park, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 0.4% in Blackwood and 1.1% in Brooklyn Park, so landlords in Blackwood face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Brooklyn Park is the bigger suburb, with a population of 5,040 against 4,266, larger than Blackwood; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Brooklyn Park for a lower purchase price, Brooklyn Park for recent price momentum, Blackwood for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison
Blackwood vs Brooklyn Park: Suburb Comparison 2026