Skip to main content

Blackwood vs Walkley Heights

Property investment comparison - Blackwood, SA 5051 vs Walkley Heights, SA 5098

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Blackwood wins 3, Walkley Heights wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricBlackwoodWalkley Heights
Median house price$1.1M$1.1M
Median unit price$700K$515K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.10%-
Gross rental yield (units)3.87%3.24%
1-year house growth+7.1%+12.1%estimate
3-year house growth+39.4%-
Vacancy rate0.4%1.0%
Population4,2663,513

Blackwood vs Walkley Heights: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1.1M in Blackwood and $1.1M in Walkley Heights, so Blackwood is the cheaper entry point.

For units, Blackwood sits at a median of $700K against $515K in Walkley Heights, which makes Walkley Heights the more affordable unit market and Blackwood the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved +7.1% in Blackwood and +12.1% in Walkley Heights (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Walkley Heights, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 0.4% in Blackwood and 1.0% in Walkley Heights, so landlords in Blackwood face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Blackwood is the bigger suburb, with a population of 4,266 against 3,513, larger than Walkley Heights; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Blackwood for a lower purchase price, Walkley Heights for recent price momentum, Blackwood for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison