Skip to main content

Blackwood vs Kurunjang

Property investment comparison - Blackwood, VIC 3458 vs Kurunjang, VIC 3337

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Blackwood wins 1, Kurunjang wins 4. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricBlackwoodKurunjang
Median house price$615K$620K
Median unit price$700K$450K
Gross rental yield (houses)-3.64%
Gross rental yield (units)3.58%4.80%
1-year house growth+5.7%estimate+12.8%
3-year house growth-+18.3%
Vacancy rate2.7%2.4%
Population38710,711

Blackwood vs Kurunjang: what the numbers say

The median house price is $615K in Blackwood and $620K in Kurunjang, so Blackwood is the cheaper entry point, with Kurunjang houses about 1% dearer.

For units, Blackwood sits at a median of $700K against $450K in Kurunjang, which makes Kurunjang the more affordable unit market and Blackwood the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved +5.7% in Blackwood (an estimate) and +12.8% in Kurunjang, so recent momentum favours Kurunjang, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 2.4% in Kurunjang and 2.7% in Blackwood, so landlords in Kurunjang face less competition for tenants.

Kurunjang is the bigger suburb, with a population of 10,711 against 387, roughly 28 times the size of Blackwood; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Blackwood for a lower purchase price, Kurunjang for recent price momentum, Kurunjang for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison