Skip to main content

Blair Athol vs Green Valley

Property investment comparison - Blair Athol, NSW 2560 vs Green Valley, NSW 2168

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Blair Athol wins 3, Green Valley wins 0. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricBlair AtholGreen Valley
Median house price$1.2M$1.2M
Median unit price$530K$875K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.05%-
Gross rental yield (units)5.23%-
1-year house growth+9.3%+9.1%estimate
3-year house growth+29.1%-
Vacancy rate0.6%1.7%
Population2,72512,919

Blair Athol vs Green Valley: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $1.2M in Blair Athol and $1.2M in Green Valley.

For units, Blair Athol sits at a median of $530K against $875K in Green Valley, which makes Blair Athol the more affordable unit market and Green Valley the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved +9.3% in Blair Athol and +9.1% in Green Valley (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Blair Athol, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 0.6% in Blair Athol and 1.7% in Green Valley, so landlords in Blair Athol face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Green Valley is the bigger suburb, with a population of 12,919 against 2,725, roughly 4.7 times the size of Blair Athol; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Blair Athol for recent price momentum, Blair Athol for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison