Skip to main content

Blayney vs Oxley Vale

Property investment comparison - Blayney, NSW 2799 vs Oxley Vale, NSW 2340

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Blayney wins 2, Oxley Vale wins 4. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricBlayneyOxley Vale
Median house price$625K$620K
Median unit price$495K-
Gross rental yield (houses)4.61%4.60%
Gross rental yield (units)4.30%4.65%
1-year house growth+11.4%+17.8%
3-year house growth+23.4%+31.2%
Vacancy rate1.2%2.8%
Population3,4483,935

Blayney vs Oxley Vale: what the numbers say

The median house price is $625K in Blayney and $620K in Oxley Vale, so Oxley Vale is the cheaper entry point, with Blayney houses about 1% dearer.

Gross rental yield on houses is effectively level, at 4.61% in Blayney and 4.60% in Oxley Vale, so neither suburb has a cash flow edge on houses.

Over the past year house prices moved +11.4% in Blayney and +17.8% in Oxley Vale, so recent momentum favours Oxley Vale, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Blayney houses are +23.4% and Oxley Vale houses +31.2%, so Oxley Vale has compounded faster than Blayney over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 1.2% in Blayney and 2.8% in Oxley Vale, so landlords in Blayney face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Oxley Vale is the bigger suburb, with a population of 3,935 against 3,448, larger than Blayney; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Oxley Vale for a lower purchase price, Oxley Vale for recent price momentum, Blayney for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison