Skip to main content

Blayney vs Rowan

Property investment comparison - Blayney, NSW 2799 vs Rowan, NSW 2650

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Blayney wins 1, Rowan wins 5. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricBlayneyRowan
Median house price$625K$620K
Median unit price$495K$385K
Gross rental yield (houses)4.61%4.58%
Gross rental yield (units)4.30%5.61%
1-year house growth+11.4%+23.4%estimate
3-year house growth+23.4%-
Vacancy rate1.2%1.0%
Population3,448105

Blayney vs Rowan: what the numbers say

The median house price is $625K in Blayney and $620K in Rowan, so Rowan is the cheaper entry point, with Blayney houses about 1% dearer.

For units, Blayney sits at a median of $495K against $385K in Rowan, which makes Rowan the more affordable unit market and Blayney the pricier one.

Gross rental yield on houses is effectively level, at 4.61% in Blayney and 4.58% in Rowan, so neither suburb has a cash flow edge on houses.

Over the past year house prices moved +11.4% in Blayney and +23.4% in Rowan (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Rowan, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 1.0% in Rowan and 1.2% in Blayney, so landlords in Rowan face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Blayney is the bigger suburb, with a population of 3,448 against 105, roughly 33 times the size of Rowan; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Rowan for a lower purchase price, Rowan for recent price momentum, Rowan for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison