Skip to main content

Blowhard vs Noble Park North

Property investment comparison - Blowhard, VIC 3352 vs Noble Park North, VIC 3174

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Blowhard wins 2, Noble Park North wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricBlowhardNoble Park North
Median house price$830K$825K
Median unit price$495K$665K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.62%3.65%
Gross rental yield (units)3.71%4.21%
1-year house growth-+3.3%
3-year house growth-+12.1%
Vacancy rate1.8%2.3%
Population827,436

Blowhard vs Noble Park North: what the numbers say

The median house price is $830K in Blowhard and $825K in Noble Park North, so Noble Park North is the cheaper entry point, with Blowhard houses about 1% dearer.

For units, Blowhard sits at a median of $495K against $665K in Noble Park North, which makes Blowhard the more affordable unit market and Noble Park North the pricier one.

Gross rental yield on houses is effectively level, at 3.62% in Blowhard and 3.65% in Noble Park North, so neither suburb has a cash flow edge on houses.

Rental vacancy is 1.8% in Blowhard and 2.3% in Noble Park North, so landlords in Blowhard face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Noble Park North is the bigger suburb, with a population of 7,436 against 82, roughly 91 times the size of Blowhard; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Noble Park North for a lower purchase price, Blowhard for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison