Skip to main content

Bluewater vs Holloways Beach

Property investment comparison - Bluewater, QLD 4818 vs Holloways Beach, QLD 4878

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Bluewater wins 1, Holloways Beach wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricBluewaterHolloways Beach
Median house price$755K$755K
Median unit price$520K-
Gross rental yield (houses)4.35%4.96%
Gross rental yield (units)4.22%-
1-year house growth+13.9%+18.4%estimate
3-year house growth+55.3%-
Vacancy rate1.4%1.5%
Population1,0852,398

Bluewater vs Holloways Beach: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $755K in Bluewater and $755K in Holloways Beach.

On cash flow, Holloways Beach leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.96%, compared with 4.35% in Bluewater, a gap of 0.61 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +13.9% in Bluewater and +18.4% in Holloways Beach (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Holloways Beach, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 1.4% in Bluewater and 1.5% in Holloways Beach, so landlords in Bluewater face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Holloways Beach is the bigger suburb, with a population of 2,398 against 1,085, roughly 2.2 times the size of Bluewater; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Holloways Beach for rental income, Holloways Beach for recent price momentum, Bluewater for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison